Avatar of Geoff

strange 911, sandy hook story

0 rating, 4 votes0 rating, 4 votes (0 rating, 4 votes, rated)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ... Loading ...

January 23, 2013 in Weird News

by

Published: Tuesday, January 22nd, 2013
I know some stupid people. I know some Sandy Hook conspiracy theorists. But I repeat myself.

A Google search would indicate growing claims there was no shooting in Newtown, Conn., and the interviews and funerals were performed by “crisis actors” the government hired … all to rally support for gun control.

Regarding such claims, Daily Kos blogger Michael Lazzaro penned Saturday, “It’s important to remember that for the most part these people were already spectacularly stupid consipracy theorists before the Sandy Hook shootings ever happened.”

I can relate. Before Sandy Hook, these people told me the “Loose Change” video charged the government orchestrated the Sept. 11 attacks to rally support for a war.

“Sandy Hook Hoax” and “Loose Change” have the same structure: Dozens of outlier items that don’t hold up on their own are pieced together like a jigsaw puzzle with menacing music … uncovering a diabolical secret plan by a government that was too incompetent to cover up Secret Service agents hiring prostitutes.

“Loose Change” argued the Twin Towers were brought down by a controlled demolition because jet fuel from crashed jets wouldn’t burn hot enough to melt steel. That’s true, but jet fuel does burn hot enough to cut steel’s strength by 50 percent. So the tower falls, and each tower floor below it would collapse under the cumulative weight of all the floors above falling on it.

“Sandy Hook Hoax” has a lot of weak links, as well:

z “Emilie Parker was supposedly a shooting victim, but she was in a photo with President Obama after the shootings.” The Parkers had three daughters, and middle daughter Madeline looked somewhat like older daughter Emilie. A current photo of the family shows Madeline is a spot-on match for the girl with President Obama.

z “Robbie Parker laughed before a press conference; he’s an actor, not a grieving parent.” When your daughter is part of a massacre, and you have to deal with that while addressing the national media spotlight, then you can tell us what coping mechanisms are fine and off limits.

z “It’s a media conspiracy.” A former coworker reminded me: Only people who have never worked in media believe the media could orchestrate anything. Honestly, some days we can barely orchestrate the media.

A friend argues a Sandy Hook hoax based of those points, plus videos of people from the shooting compared to grainy photos of the crisis actors he claims were used.

I’m not trying to be racist here, but a lot of us white people look the same. I’ve been told I look like Christopher Reeve and James Bond, and a telemarketer said Saturday I sounded exactly like her son-in-law (I responded, “Tell him I said hi.”).

The mind makes the connections it wants to make. In this case, a government hoax is more plausible than two white women who look the same. Don’t waste your time arguing, because you can’t reason people out of what they weren’t reasoned into.

I’ve already given this more consideration than it deserves. It doesn’t even deserve my normal snide conclusion. But if it makes you feel better, make one up and say the government wouldn’t let my column finish that way.

Kevin Wilson is a columnist for Clovis Media Inc. He can be contacted at 763-3431, ext. 313, or by email:kwilson@cnjonline.com


Infowars.com Videos:

Comment on this article:

7 responses to strange 911, sandy hook story

  1. alcohol these are not my views this was a reposting of some jack ass whom wrote and published it with his obscure view of reality hence strange in the name. thanks for the emails tho

  2. Apparently the world is a stage to fool us.

  3. Hey Geoff, what do you think of this?

    http://planet.infowars.com/resistance/weapon-of-mass-distraction-from-real-solutions

    Feel free to include a snide conclusion. As Voltaire said, “while I disagree with what you say, I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

  4. It’s only been a month after the Connecticut massacre, and all we have to go on is secondary sources, what little video has been released. Just like the pentagon strike in 2001, we know there is ample video footage that is not being released. If they simply release the video, which they have no good reason to withhold, skepticism may be put to rest.

    I personally don’t have an opinion about the shooting, could be that the media is actually telling the truth for once, or it could be a complete fabrication, or something in-between, but I don’t know, I’ll just be skeptical.

    9/11 is a different matter. It is not physically possible for an entire 110 story skyscraper to collapse in ten seconds, force will always follow the path of least resistance yet the weight you claim added up to create the complete destruction went straight down through the MOST RESISTANT PATH. In ten seconds. So it’s not theory, but scientific FACT that 9/11 did not occur the way NIST described.

    “Believe” whatever you want about both tragedies, meanwhile I KNOW.

  5. Its already been proven that the government’s “Pancake Collapse Theory” is erroneous for the simple reason that it would have taken over a minute to collapse that way versus the 10 to 15 seconds it took which is evident in the videos. That’s free-fall speed, btw. Which means there was nothing hindering the collapse. Ergo, the floors below the top were demolished in some fashion and there was no resistance to make the collapse take any longer.

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.