Avatar of Ronald

THE BILL OF RIGHTS EXPLAINED

3 rating, 3 votes3 rating, 3 votes (+3 rating, 3 votes, rated)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ... Loading ...

December 29, 2012 in Resistance

by

The Bill Of Rights: Explained
Copyright December 26th 2012
Ronald Boldt

For several years I have listened to the moronic mental deviants known as the American population state that they have rights, and yet very few of them know that their rights are, let alone if it is Constitutional or Civil Rights.

The difference is extreme. Constitutional Rights cannot be stripped away, at least according to the founding fathers, whereas civil rights are allowed to be changed by the people.

Here is an example you want to walk naked through your town with a sandwich board covering you, which has some text upon it. Can you be arrested, and is it protected under the Constitution or under Civil rights?

It is protected under the Constitution as you are exercising your freedom of speech.

Here is the next question to see if you are awake or a Zombie.

You are gay and you want to work for a company, ABC Auto, and they refuse to hire you; is this protected under the Constitution or Civil Rights?

This is civil rights.

Do you see the difference? No…Ok here let me tell you like I would any other Zombie out there.

If it is not written in the Constitution then it is a civil right, if it is in the Constitution then it is a Constitutional Right.

Many morons say that they have the right to a free education, a right to work and a right to health care. Sorry Charlie but that is wrong. Nowhere in the Constitution nor the Bill of Rights which in a while I will break down for you to understand and teach it to others.

Anyone that swore to uphold the Constitution should be able to know the difference and at least what each of the Ten Amendments mean.

For many Constitutionalists, the Bill Of Rights are the one and true concepts of this nation. And these cannot ever be redacted changed or removed.

When the Bill of Rights and the Constitution were written it was done in a simplistic eloquence that people could easily understand. The words were simple and easy to understand simply due to the fact that a majority of people could not read or write, but they did know basic laws and concepts were. These were not written for lawyers or judges to debate over every little word; it was not meant to be subjective but very literal.

At that date and time there was very little contracts, a man’s word was law and honor was held in high esteem. Today our Forefathers would be turning over in their graves decrying out for blood of the traitors.

These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the “Bill of Rights.”
________________________________________
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

In the first part of this it clearly states that there is a separation of church and state, and that there can never be a state run religion; nor can the state stop anyone from practicing any religion {WITHIN REASON AND WITHIN THE LAWS-SUCH AS HUMAN SACRIFICE WILL GET YOU PRISON TIME.}

The second part abridging the freedom of speech or of the press is extremely important to journalist and any free thinker as this means it is a crime {HIGH TREASON} for any elected official, government agent or officer to attempt to censor or stop the freedom of speech in any manner.

The freedom of speech and press is protected, and that means you can write anything, as long as it is not a lie, about anything without fear of imprisonment, and no one has the right to prevent you from doing so. Thus if you were a white supremacist you have as much right to march, protest or write articles as much as the tree hugger, who happens to have the IQ of a retarted animal cracker. The thing is I may not like it but I have the right not to listen to watch or read what you are saying and doing.

Now here I will briefly touch on one thing pornography, can this be censored or can a person go to prison for this? The answer is no, Larry Flyntt the owner of Hustler/Penthouse, had won a Supreme Court victory over this. The fact is you may have the right to create porn, but people also have the right not to sell it in their place of business or look at it, but regardless if it ranged from clown fetish to child porn, according to the Constitution it is protected, yet here is the kick in the pants, according to the state laws, the use of minors in sexually suggestive poses is a crime, even though it is protected so the only way that can be overturned if someone does take that to the Supreme Court and forces them to rule.

Or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. This section is unique for it stipulates two things that many do not understand fully; and I will explain it to you monkeys.

Peaceably assemble- for you fool out there that think you can march on DC and start a riot the answer is no. See the first word Peaceably, this does not mean you cannot yell or scream it means you cannot do violence.

Petition…redress of grievances- this means you can demand in writing, which they also will have to give, your complaints and demands for them to be improved. This does not mean that you have to write a petition.

Within this you will see that nowhere is there a law that mandates you must have a permit or petition for a permit, and to be forced to get one violates the Fist Amendment and is a crime of HIGH TREASON.

________________________________________
Amendment II
A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

A well-regulated Militia, —-Well Regulated Militia means this, the people within the community shall be armed with military weapons so that they could protect their communities from all enemies foreign and domestic. This was done so that there could never be a long standing army or military might. This would free up tax dollars on having to pay for standing military, and the logical fact that if the people were armed with military grade weapons, then they could react instantly against any threat.

Along with this the fact that by having the people armed with the military grade weapons, they could prevent a government from overthrowing their rights.

In 1854 the US Supreme Court ruled that any private person does have the right to own military weapons, and that it is illegal for anyone including the police to prevent anyone from carrying any weapon. This has never been overturned.

being necessary to the security of a free State, —-Here it reiterates that the people, not the government or a select few individuals have to right to own operate carry and use both as defensive and offensive weapons to protect their persons, homes and way of life.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.—This final statement is important since the federal government in the 1967 Gun Act violates the Constitution by saying people who have been convicted cannot own firearms, nowhere is this allowed in the Constitution, as a matter of fact it shows very clearly that they cannot stop them from having owning or using them. For this to be done, any gun control law you have to do it through a Constitutional Amendment, which they have not done, and as such violates the Constitution and is an act of High Treason.

SO when you read it and understand what they meant and still means today is that WE THE PEOPLE, have to same rights as the military and police to have own operate any weapon that we can buy, without fear or threat of wrongful imprisonment and execution.

________________________________________
Amendment III
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

This literally means no soldiers can confiscate your home or property is it in time of war or peace. If they enter your home during a time of peace or war they can be shot and hung for crimes of HIGH TREASON.

Many liberals will say well if it is for the common good, wrong you mental midgets, it does not say within this amendment for the common good or the betterment of all, it is very simple and very plain.
________________________________________
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The Fourth Amendment is very important in this age due to the fact that the federal government has violated it time and again, along with the police the NSA and other government agencies all in the name of National Security, which is not protected or allowed under the Constitution.

What this means is anyone police, sheriff, or government agents attempt to, 1. Listen in to your conversations on the phone, internet, in private, on via other forms of telecommunications without a warrant sworn out by a Grand Jury is breaking the law is a crime of HIGH TREASON. 2. Read you mail, email, SMS, Text, hack into your computer, read your blog, or another means without a warrant sworn out by a Grand Jury is breaking the law is a crime of HIGH TREASON. 3. They cannot do a search and seizure on yourself your person your property vehicle or home without a warrant sworn out by a Grand Jury is breaking the law is a crime of HIGH TREASON.

Here is what a Warrant must have: Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. No let’s say you were given a warrant to search for that alien from Alpha Centari who you hinted at hiding in your basement, the Warrant says your name, the place, meaning just the basement, and the person or things in it to be seized. Now if you have a kilo of pot sitting on the table, they cannot seize that since it was not written in the warrant. If you have an atomic bomb ready to detonate, they cannot seize that again it was not covered in the warrant; and nor can you be charged for having those since again they were not covered in the warrant.

If they do try to charge you for these then that is again a crime of HIGH TREASON.

________________________________________
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

This is a long one so I will break it down for you:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; —- A capital crime is murder. Now according to this first part, they need two things writ of habious corpus and writ of habious delecti, in other words not only do they need probable cause but they need the body, no body no crime. To take this to a Grand Jury, they need to show that you had the means motive and opportunity, along with the body to even go in front of the Grand Jury. The only time this is exempted is if you are in the Militia or in the military during a time of war or public danger; then you are tried in a military tribunal not a civilian criminal court.

nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; This is the Double Jeopardy clause, if a jury finds you innocent or better yet let’s say not guilty then the government cannot put you on trial again for the same crime, even if they reword or rework the crime details to get a conviction, well you killed Joe Blow with you gun because he was going to rape you, now they say you Killed Joe Blow with a bullet because he was going to have sex with you.

Nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.—- Ok this is simple you are not compelled to testify against yourself, you must have due process done, meaning that if it is a criminal trial then they must have had a correct search warrant, gone in front of a Grand Jury to get the search warrant, have the warrant correctly issued dated signed written out with your name, location, and what they are looking for, then formally charge you, read you’re your Miranda Rights, not force a statement out of you or another, allow you a counsel, and then a trial by your peers.

Your personal property cannot be taken without just compensation this means Uncle BuckWheat in the White House wants your home and land for his new parking lot, then he has to pay you, what you want and feel is just, not what others think or say is just.;

________________________________________
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

This is self-explanatory: speedy, public trail, of your peers, Meaning they must have the same background as you, they cannot have bankers and lawyers on the jury if you are accused of robbing a bank for the lawyers. It must be where the crime happened. You have to be informed of the crime against you and the nature of the crime, in other words who swore out this against you, have to right to confront your accuser and have the same rights as the prosecution.

________________________________________
Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

You have the right to file civil suits against both the government and individuals for loss of property and income.
________________________________________
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

This is self-explanatory and yet is constantly abused by the courts. By placing a high fine on someone, excessive bail that the courts know you cannot afford is a crime of HIGH TREASON.
________________________________________
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

No one can infringe your rights protected under the Constitution.
________________________________________
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

This is the right of the States to govern themselves and the rights of the people to govern the states. This prevents the federal government from mandating laws, fees, fines, taxes et el against the people and or a State without the people of that State, thus that State voting on them.

This is one point where the current Administration is breaking the law everyday with Obama’s mandates and Executive Orders he passes down to his slaves.

The term High Treason you will see I use it over and over again in here is meant for anyone one that have sworn an oath to protect this country and the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic; and if they break this oath, then that is HIGH TREASON, which means they can get a choice a rope or a bullet.

High Treason is not only in the time of war but when the very Constitution is threatened by the enemies within our own government such as the Liberals, Democrats and Obama are currently doing.

So now you know your Bill of Rights.


Infowars.com Videos:

Comment on this article:

14 responses to THE BILL OF RIGHTS EXPLAINED

  1. Every child born in the U.S. should be handed a copy of the Constitution & the Bill of Rights! They should learn EVERY WORD within them, understand WHY these documents were written, and they should be able to recite them without hesitation!

  2. I love how sometimes the perception of enforcement sometimes draws away from those few later amendments. For example, “or to the people” in amendment ten is a perfect example of how to better enforce laws among the people. It’s SUPPOSED to be generally OK so long as it doesn’t break the law. Big perception gap on that fact, at least from over here ;)

    “to attempt to censor or stop the freedom of speech in any manner.”

    This particular bit does technically imply that government cannot enforce anti-free speech laws, it simply means “keep out you tyrant!” in both being anti-free speech and pro-free speech.

  3. WHY DID YOU SAY THIS WAS COPYRIGHTED??????

    • The Bill of Rights is not Copyrighted but the definitions is, I don’t mind if it is shared as long as I get credit for it.

      The design, layout and definitions is copyrighted.

  4. Good article. More people should fully understand what the constitution is saying. After the recent shooting a coworker of mine said the well regulated militia means one that is regulated. I said no, that regulated means functioning properly. One of the founding fathers said the beauty of the second amendment is that we don’t need it until they try to take it away from us…I wonder what part of “shall not be infringed” they, and my coworker, do not understand. The flaw in this government is the imposing of one’s will over another.

    • This is the reason why I went ahead and did the definition and explaining it to the people. no one really seems to understand what rights and RIGHTS mean.

      Oliver Wendel Holmes said it best, when talking about any of the Rights of an American, : Your Right to swing your cane, ends where my nose begins.” Or for the zombies out there, yes you may have the right to do something but you do not have the right to violate another person’s right to safety and defense.

      I get sicken by so called awaken people who does not even know the Bill of Rights, let alone the Three Founding Principle Papers that created this country.. The Federalist Papers, The Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution {BILL OF RIGHTS}.

      Many assume that the later amendments are as or more important then the first ten, which I hate to say wrong. These Ten Can Not Be Changed. That is why they are called the Bill Of Rights. The later ones can be added and then changed, but the first ten can not.

  5. My friend, most US citizens have privliges and garentees, not rights as they are US citizens not true Americans.

    • Americans have Rights, not privileges, and guarantees, a privilege or guarantee can be revoked where as the Rights can not. … Too many of Americans think they have a privilege to drive a car, or it is a privilege to live here, when the child is born to two American parents, that is wrong. Remember people you have RIGHTS.

      Obama as the Muslim nutjob that he is, said the Bill of Rights is a Contract, wrong he stated this because contracts can be broken; the Constitution can not.

      I would love to debate that wack job for three hours, non stop and prove to the world what a simpleton he is on history, the law, and the Constitution. I would even allow him a teleprompter, since we know he can not speak without one.

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.