Accumulation is the rock upon the still waters
January 18, 2013 in Resistance
Friday, January 18, 2013
The case against Adam Lanza is a very deceptive one. Particularly, amongst the numerous reports on how the tragedy went down, there is a significant amount of data relative to the case, and most of that data has not been put on display, and that data could easily disprove the “official story”. Commonly, to prove that a person is guilty, the media will resort to hardline facts and opinion to strengthen their approach, especially with a shooting. The common rule for all stations is to never portray the killer in a good light. That being said, there would never be a viewpoint anywhere in the mainstream media which, in the face of their competition, might make them look like sympathizers.
This being what we call “rhetoric”, let’s examine how this has been manipulated into being an accumulative set of facts for the American people, and people of the world, to believe. Keep in mind that control of murders does not imply control of guns.
On the first day, there were reports that there was two people in the school. I said before the school was in Stratford, CT, and I apologize, as I merely saw a video feed from a helicopter over Stanford (As identified in the top-left corner of the screen) while a report was going on. Apparently the city is named “Newtown”. This report was part of live coverage going on as the situation was being shut down. In the end, they could all agree that Adam Lanza was dead, his brother in custody, and a strange person was in the bushes. The fact that Ryan Lanza was reported to not have been there is effected by two things; a Facebook account saying that “it wasn’t me”, which was harvested online as images by some people named “@Fletch788″ and “@MattBors” of Twitter fame, and a report by Brett Wilshe, in which he describes Ryan Lanza as a “nice guy” and that “I never knew about his brother”, but that “We hung out through friends once a month” for an undetermined period of time.
What the media decided to do off of all this is to try and get people to focus on other subjects, such as implications of the event, and how they could further their goal of aiding someone else in disarming the country. Because these reports came out of a situation that called for extreme discrimination against the supposed perpetrator of the event, and the lack of real information via law enforcement, it was critical for the producers of the news networks to come up with something interesting. Therein began the descent into an accumulative madness that has precipitated the decision to associate school shootings, which is the crime of murder, and the ownership of guns, which is not a crime (In most cases). While people such as Robbie Parker, father of Emilie Parker, were censored multiple times on TV, the media was busy formulating a tentative media schedule that would be in place for the remainder of their coverage.
Again, because at the time there was a lack of information, and the rhetoric in the newsroom, the media was biased on all fronts. Now enters the official information into the foray.
We had been given a doctor, who does not know his subconscious from a toothpick, who was adamant that the bullets came from the “long gun”. This statement automatically associated the gun into the equation, and that because of this gun, multiple people died. It was, as Alex Jones put it, an “M4-AR15 variant”, but is commonly called “Bushmaster .223″ as I understand it. The gun may have been the tool used to perpetrate the event, but of course, we’re talking about murder. Guns themselves have a perception, and that’s simply based on need and convenience when it comes down to it. Sure, take the .223 to a mall, you can do more, but the handgun is stealthy. You have choices with guns. The guns do not make the choice for you to go somewhere. So while the supposed “doctor”, who was unsure of what to say to people, was busy explaining things to people, he often made jokes, which causes me to think he is repressing the actual seriousness of the experience in his mind, and it is being translated into something “necessary” by his brain. He himself consciously allows whatever it is to be useful to say, and in needing extra energy, he found it, even if he only “sort of” found it.
In short, he was hiding something and is terrible at doing it, though few people actually cared.
So when we talk about how the event happened, all we know is that the media has told us what happened. There is something we’re missing, and that is how a parallel-running timeline of events could be accepted by the general populous. It was made possible by the combination of reporting synchronicity, and the actual type of reporting the reporters and their teams were told to find, because of their representative networks’ ratings management. We all know that the parents identified their kids via photograph, and the funerals were held in succession, the final three bring buried on December 22nd. It’d like to speak my mind, and tell you my interpretation of the story.
Nancy Champion Lanza was a prepper. At the time, she was very well known within her own family for being such, and as such, Nancy would have been under surveillance due to the chatter about her being a prepper. She took care of both Ryan and Adam at her home, as they both lived with her. Since the evaluation of the situation would have come back something like “Not a huge issue here”, the surveillance was probably necessity based.
This next part gets fairly dark, so bear with me as I fight out the riddle. The relatives of the Lanza’s had continuously pointed to Nancy being a prepper, and that she may have acted erratically at times. To the media, the family has been described as many things, but we are left with the perception that they were just “odd”. This leaves us with the possibility that they have been the ones who were at least responsible for setting this up, even if they had no direct relationship with the perpetrators. Whatever their connection is, which undoubtedly will be discovered soon, it allowed someone else to “watch the watchers”, to find out their timing routines.
As we noted, the risk of the Lanza’s were minimal, because through surveillance they were able to find out when they have periods of activity. The morning not being one of those times, they had no reason to have a guy “Just chillin’” down the street. During that period, it is my belief that a man who knew the Lanza’s, and whom the Lanza’s knew, came up to the front door and knocked. I believe it was Adam or Ryan, as the mother was found dead in her bed. Being able to be let in, the man walked in and let in another two people who came through the bush in the backyard. The two men walked around the hallway and up the stairs, taking Nancy by surprise.
The two boys were taken down to Newtown in their mothers car, guns and escort in tow. Remember, just because they only caught one guy in the bushes doesn’t mean that another didn’t get away in another direction. It’s likely the boys were convinced their mom would be OK if they played along, which may or may not have happened. In some ways, seeing her found dead afterward could be very disheartening and powerful to anyone watching, especially to surviving Ryan, potentially disarming him from saying anything. As he has not surfaced in person, and as the only living testament to the situation, his status is necessary in confirming all parties guilty. His presence in the school is not required for this parallel to exist, but it sure looks like he was.
I may never have a way of proving that, as the school security footage is not present.
As the emergency first responders came onto the scene, it’s possible that some of them were fighting to get to the front line, arguably acceptable behavior defined beforehand and used. As military boots arrived on the ground, and there is footage of people in fatigues there on the scene, it would be possible to lock up anyone under secure lock and key, especially if you are not a military person. So as the police handed the custody of Ryan Lanza over to the “military”, the record of his location had to be predefined by someone else, which ended up coming into play as mentioned above. The police would be looking to the military, and the military wouldn’t say much, much less say anything at all, ESPECIALLY if he wasn’t in their custody.
Man, I would love to talk to the real Ryan Lanza who lived with his mother!
When we look at all the things that have come out of this set of events, it is quite obvious that this parallel story has been hidden exactly as planned, and it calls into question what the link to a thing called Mysticism involves. For example, the roof of the Newtown fire hall is decorated in pentacles, as is one of the older cobblestone roads of the city, and as many houses are everywhere. While that itself is not a proof of the link, this is something which could arguable NOT be proven because nobody asked about it, and nobody would bother reporting on what would be perceived as a “conspiracy theory” in the midst of the official media portrayal, which as I described, was all arranged beforehand. Nobody would question why the relatives would say such things about the Lanza family. And, of course, nobody would question the report of a so-called doctor.
I can only conclude that the parallel story I have portrayed is proved by the facts available, but so also is the official story proved by the same. If anyone could get their hands on the video footage in the school, find out the status of the Lanza family surveillance, finally discover that whoever is living in Hoboken is definitely and unarguably Ryan Lanza, make sure the man in the bushes was not accompanied by another, and find out where this man in the bushes is today, it is entirely possible to disprove all of this. But this is something the media will not cover, not for any peace of mind, because as I said, the media has no interest in this by default. Accumulation on gun rights, therefore, is the motive of those whom I believe coerced Adam Lanza, and that it is directly tied to the mysticism I spoke of.