Avatar of notfooledanymorebystratfor

After Obama win, U.S. backs new U.N. arms treaty talks

0 rating, 0 votes0 rating, 0 votes (0 rating, 0 votes, rated)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ... Loading ...

November 9, 2012 in Preparedness

by

After Obama win, U.S. backs new U.N. arms treaty talks

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE8A627J20121107?irpc=932

TOP NEWS
After Obama win, U.S. backs new U.N. arms treaty talks
Wed, Nov 07 18:48 PM EST

By Louis Charbonneau

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – Hours after U.S. President Barack Obama was
re-elected, the United States backed a U.N. committee’s call on
Wednesday to renew debate over a draft international treaty to
regulate the $70 billion global conventional arms trade.

U.N. delegates and gun control activists have complained that talks
collapsed in July largely because Obama feared attacks from Republican
rival Mitt Romney if his administration was seen as supporting the
pact, a charge Washington denies.

The month-long talks at U.N. headquarters broke off after the United
States – along with Russia and other major arms producers – said it
had problems with the draft treaty and asked for more time.

But the U.N. General Assembly’s disarmament committee moved quickly
after Obama’s win to approve a resolution calling for a new round of
talks March 18-28. It passed with 157 votes in favor, none against and
18 abstentions.

U.N. diplomats said the vote had been expected before Tuesday’s U.S.
presidential election but was delayed due to Superstorm Sandy, which
caused a three-day closure of the United Nations last week.

An official at the U.S. mission said Washington’s objectives have not changed.

“We seek a treaty that contributes to international security by
fighting illicit arms trafficking and proliferation, protects the
sovereign right of states to conduct legitimate arms trade, and meets
the concerns that we have been articulating throughout,” the official
said.

“We will not accept any treaty that infringes on the constitutional
rights of our citizens to bear arms,” he said.

U.S. officials have acknowledged privately that the treaty under
discussion would have no effect on domestic gun sales and ownership
because it would apply only to exports.

The main reason the arms trade talks are taking place at all is that
the United States – the world’s biggest arms trader accounting for
more than 40 percent of global conventional arms transfers – reversed
U.S. policy on the issue after Obama was first elected and decided in
2009 to support a treaty.

‘MONTHS AWAY’ FROM DEAL?

Countries that abstained included Russia, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Sudan,
Belarus, Cuba and Iran. China, a major arms producer that has
traditionally abstained, voted in favor.

Among the top six arms-exporting nations, Russia cast the only
abstention. Britain, France and Germany joined China and the United
States in support of the resolution.

The measure now goes to the 193-nation General Assembly for a formal
vote. It is expected to pass.

The resolution said countries are “determined to build on the progress
made to date towards the adoption of a strong, balanced and effective
Arms Trade Treaty.”

Jeff Abramson, director of Control Arms, a coalition of advocacy
groups, urged states to agree on stringent provisions.

“In Syria, we have seen the death toll rise well over 30,000, with
weapons and ammunition pouring in the country for months now,” he
said. “We need a treaty that will set tough rules to control the arms
trade, that will save lives and truly make the world a better place.”

Brian Wood of Amnesty International said: “After today’s resounding
vote, if the larger arms trading countries show real political will in
the negotiations, we’re only months away from securing a new global
deal that has the potential to stop weapons reaching those who
seriously abuse human rights.”

The treaty would require states to make respecting human rights a
criterion for allowing arms exports.

Britain’s U.N. mission said on its Twitter feed it hoped that the
March negotiations would yield the final text of a treaty. Such a pact
would then need to be ratified by the individual signatories before it
could enter into force.

The National Rifle Association, the powerful U.S. interest group,
strongly opposes the arms treaty and had endorsed Romney.

The United States has denied it sought to delay negotiations for
political reasons, saying it had genuine problems with the draft as
written.

(Editing by Xavier Briand)


Infowars.com Videos:

Comment on this article:

1 response to After Obama win, U.S. backs new U.N. arms treaty talks

  1. LIES, LIES, LIES!!! The great and powerful King Obama would never take our…………wait…..what does this article say?

    Aw $hit!

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.