Avatar of Sheila

USWGO Brian D. Hill fires lawyer, and forced to take Polygraph; Law Enforcement Whistleblower reports Brian’s set up on child porn

1 rating, 1 vote1 rating, 1 vote (+1 rating, 1 votes, rated)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ... Loading ...

February 27, 2015 in Politics

by

Brian D. Hill(left), Alex Jones(Center), and Stewart Rhodes(right)

Today Brian D. Hill, the former USWGO Alternative News reporter and Founder, has informed me that a serious of events has just happened which he wished to inform the General public about including the alternative media. First of all Brian has fired his Appellate case lawyer Mark A. Jones of the ‘Bell, Davis, and Pitt’ law firm in Winston Salem, NC. He also gives various reasons as to why he has kicked his attorney out of his case and as to why he is proceeding Pro Se.In addition to that Brian has filed a Pro Se Motion to Strike Doc. 14 which was filed by his Appellate lawyer Mark. A. Jones for not representing his response to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

He is also being forced under his Probation Officer to SUBMIT to a Polygraph exam even when there is evidence that Brian will give false positives in the lie detector test due to his Autism and Generalized Anxiety Disorder which will cause legal repercussions on him under Supervised Release which will land Brian back in Jail in North Carolina where he will lose weight until he is dead, I am serious here. Brian stated to his PO that he will plead the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution for every question asked so that false lies won’t show up in the Polygraph when Brian attempts to tell the truth. His PO threatened him with consequences if Brian even dares to plead the fifth to every question asked during the exam. Brian changed his mind after being coerced by his PO and made a statement to her that Brian will give false statements(of guilt) when he is forced under Probation to testify against his will. The PO did not care and so Brian contacted the Polygraph examiner Ingram in Danville, VA. He explained to him that he needed to reschedule the Polygraph exam(assuming the test was going to be soon but was a misunderstanding) because his grandpa had Pneumonia and that his whole family had to be there in case Brian made a false admission of guilt or that a false positive was created throughout the lie detector test so that his family can explain under Affidavit that Brian wasn’t lying on this or that during the exam due to his Mild Autism(Autism Spectrum Disorder). Ingram called him back basically refusing to administer the Polygraph test on Brian(likely due to him admitting he has Autism and that it can affect the Polygraph) and wanted him to call his Probation Officer informing her that Ingram will not conduct the testing. This is the first refusal on the experts part to test Brian in a Polygraph exam. The PO will likely attempt to find another to still attempt to force Brian to make false lies(false positives) so that Probation will have a grand excuse to revoke his Supervised Release to throw Brian in Federal Prison. Likely apart of a plot by the U.S. Attorney and Mayodan Police Department(the same ones that sent Brian child porn which I mention in earlier article) to destroy Brian’s Appeal in the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.

A claimed Law Enforcement Whistleblower sent an email to Brian David Hill’s cell phone as a Multimedia Text Message(MMS) and to a pile of FBI(according to Susan Basko) with information as to Brian’s set up on child pornography, explaining that he had no choice and was following orders of the commanding officer or agent, and offered evidence in attachments to the email to help clear Brian’s name. That Whistleblower has not yet been identified and may actually be involved somehow with the Mayodan Police Department. According to a cross examination between Brian’s statement under Declaration and the statement by the Whistleblower they both mention that it was a 160GB Hard Disk Drive and that the model number was HTS542516K9SAOO. Both made statements that the content was child pornography and that it had something to do with the Mayodan Police Department. There is no mistake that the Whistleblower has a direct connection with somebody that is involved in Brian’s criminal case and/or the criminal investigation that was conducted in North Carolina.

Brian explained to me in two text messages why he is proceeding Pro Se and firing his attorney Mark Jones. These statements are exclusive to Planet Infowars and Liveleak which allow me to publish articles that expose the things going on during his ongoing criminal Appeal.

Brian’s response on Mark Jones issue: “My lawyer Mark Jones was a disappointment. I waited for 1-2 weeks for a phone call or letter to come from Mark and nothing. Right after I told him about Mayodan Police attempting to send me child porn in that evidence box, that lawyer has never spoken to me again. Then started to file a inappropriate response which would wreck my criminal Appeal. Then later I discovered after I decided to fire him that he had been a law clerk to Chief Federal Judge William L. Osteen Jr. the same Judge that denied my Motion to Extend the Time to file the Notice of Appeal. I have a very good reason to believe that Mark is protecting the interests of Judge Osteen and not representing me as a attorney should be. I wonder about the public defenders and court appointed attorneys from the CJA Panel. Every CJA Panel attorney seems to want me to stick with my guilty plea or on purposely doesn’t do their freaking job. I DEMAND A REFORM OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT!,” “That is all I have to say in text.

Now CJA stands for the Criminal Justice Act which became law which was what started the whole court appointed attorneys. I will likely conduct research on the matter but am attempting to publish this article in a speedy manner so will skip on the explanation of the CJA law. I did however do a bit of research into Attorney Mark Jone’s connection to Greensboro, NC Chief U.S. District Court Judge William L. Osteen Jr. the same Judge that convicted Brian and accepted his guilty plea. According to Mark’s own profile on the law firm he works for, he was a law clerk for the Honorable Judge William L. Osteen Junior. A law clerk is not the same as the clerk of the court. A law clerk personally conducts legal research and aids in the Federal Judge’s legal opinions for criminal cases. So Mark has personally worked with the exact same Federal Judge that Brian has attempted to overrule through the Appellate process. Mark’s actions in Brian’s criminal case(15-4057 Appeal, 1:13-cr-435-1 District Court case in Middle District of N.C.) and connections to the exact same Judge Brian is Appealing shines great suspicion on his Appellate counsel. Then of course Mark was also responsible for Brian receiving child porn by the hands of the Mayodan Police Department earlier in the month. Mark didn’t even screen the hard drive that came in the Evidence Box.

“Jones served as Assistant United States Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina (2008-2011), where he worked in the Criminal-trial and Appellate sections. His prior experience includes service as Law Clerk to the Honorable William L. Osteen, Jr., U. S. District Court Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina in Greensboro, NC (2007-2008), to the Honorable William L. Osteen, Sr., U. S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina (2007), and to the Honor able Kathleen H. MacKay, Virginia Circuit Judge.” – Sourced from Bell, Davis, and Pitt.

Then according to my legal research into other Appeal cases that deal with Appealing decisions made by Chief Judge Osteen Jr. with being represented by Mark A. Jones, all decisions I could find using Google search were all affirmations of the U.S. District Court convictions. In United States of America v. Angel Santillan, Appeal panel ruled that “Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.” In United states of America v. Kyjahre Hasan Riley, Appeal panel ruled that “In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire record and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment.” In the last Appeal Court opinion case I could find, in United States of America v. Angel Medel Lorenzo, the Appeal panel ruled that “In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Lorenzo’s convictions and sentence.” Three different Appellate Court reviews which are easy to find in Google, which have Mark A. Jones as Appellate Counsel all result in affirmation of the U.S. District Court Judgments. It will likely be the same result in Brian’s case had he not filed a Motion to Proceed Pro Se. It appears a possible bias or conflict of interest has risen under Mark.

Brian’s response on proceeding Pro Se: “Yes I am, Sheila. Unless I get a private attorney that wishes to represent me Pro Bono, I plan on proceeding Pro Se throughout my criminal Appeal. I have some people helping me out but won’t mention names out of fear of threats against them by the perpetrators. I am confident I can win both Appeals without a court appointed lawyer. One lawyer has taken a specific interest in representing me in the event I succeed in both Appeals to take my criminal case back to the stage of a Jury Trial to try my case again, and this time I plan on NOT taking the guilty plea. I will risk my life in a gamble to overturn my conviction. That is what Brian David Hill of USWGO Alternative News is going to do. Infowars is not covering my criminal case but hopefully they will once I am acquitted.”

Now Brian plans on working Pro Se for both his two Appeal proceedings unless a private lawyer wishes to aid as Brian’s Legal Counsel on a Pro Bono basis. Infowars and Prisonplanet have not covered Brian’s criminal case with exception to Planet Infowars as this is a sensitive criminal case due to it being the subject of child pornography, however Infowars may cover his case in the event that Brian is acquitted by a Jury. It is also likely that Polygraph examiners may refuse outright to proceed in forcing Brian against his will to take the Polygraph exam due to false positives and the negative legal consequences it will have in Brian’s entire life.
See the series of Articles on Brian’s criminal Appeal:

USWGO Alt New’s Brian D. Hill files response to the Government’s MOTION, had a second child porn set up attempted on him

Former Alternative Media Head appealing criminal conviction, claimed he was framed with child pornography

Infowars.com Videos:

Comment on this article:

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.