The Carbon Tax Scam – A Tax on Breathing
After what one Australian columnist calls “…the dirtiest and most dishonest campaign ever waged before the Australian public” with millions of dollars spent on media ads to convince the uneducated population that man made global warming was a fact, even though overwhelming evidence contradicts the governments claims. The Australia’s House of Representatives then voted on October 12 2011, 74 to 72, to levy a tax on carbon pollution.
The proposal, which was pushed by Prime Minister Julia Gillard, will impose a price of $23 on a ton of carbon pollution, starting in 2015. After 2015, an emissions-trading scheme will be introduced, with the goal of cutting total carbon pollution by 5 percent by 2020. The legislation still needs to pass the Senate, but because Greens control the balance of power there, that is not likely to be a problem. Unless something dramatic happens, in a few months Australia will have taken a devastating first step toward tyranny and enslavement by the global elite.
To put it bluntly, Anthropogenic (man made) Global Warming is a load of government-sponsored bovine excrement. Its purpose is to trick you out of money and into obedience. And despite the shrill cries of those who insist that government would never conceive or let alone execute such a monstrous fraud upon the people, the fact is that Anthropogenic Global Warming has a very long pedigree of deception behind it.
The recent exposures of fraud coming from the Hadley Climate Research Unit, then followed by similar exposures at New Zealand’s NWIA, Australia’s Climate Centre, and NOAA have only confirmed the doubts arising from the obviously NON-scientific methods employed by the Anthropogenic Global Warming supporters.
Human Caused Global Warming is not being researched; it is being promoted. Al Gore and his fellow investors have spent over a hundred million dollars in creating a crisis of human-caused global warming out of (quite literally) thin air. They are not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts. They expect to reap billions in profits from the trading of Carbon Credits, a “license to pollute” available for a price and subject to brokerage fees. One of the people Al Gore relied on to create this scheme was Ken Lay, late of ENRON, aka the Crooked “E”. Al Gore plans to use Carbon Dioxide to do to the world what Ken Lay did to California using electricity; loot the people!
Coupled with the desire to reap huge profits from the general population of the world is also the agenda to promote a global government. Currently, the push for a global government rests on three pillars, Global Warming is one of them, leading to a surrendering of national sovereignty attempted at the Copenhagen Conference December 7th, 2009 (but temporarily delayed when the conference was hit with a major blizzard). The other two pillars exploited to create the “need” for a global government are a global flu pandemic, requiring a global health organization, and a global financial crisis, requiring a global bank. The political power behind this push for global government is immense; enough to win Al Gore an Academy Award and a Nobel Peace Prize for his film, “An Inconvenient Truth”, despite a court ruling pointing out the numerous provable lies and distortions in it.
To any real objective observer, the methods employed by the pro global warmers are not those of science and research but of salesmanship and propaganda. Scare tactics are also well in evidence.
What science does Julia Gillard listen to?
Because the climate is chaotic it is not predictable in the long term. However, all of the evidence the Australian government has relied on is “consensus” science. Consensus is basically an uneducated guesses. For example, let’s say you are sitting around with your friends planning a picnic. You more or less all decide that the park you will go to will not be very busy, and that the weather will be fine. But none of you know for certain that it will all work out that way. You may get to the park and it is pouring rain, or 2 bus loads of the CWA have just arrived for their annual get together. If one of you had done some research you probably would have picked another weekend!
That is why every scientist from Aristotle 4200 years ago to Ibn al-Haytham, the founder of the scientific method in 11 century Iraq to Karl Popper in 1934 in the celebrated book The Logic of Scientific Discovery employs rigorous standards to research rather than rely on consensus.
The government of Australia has been listening to the consensus science expressed in the documents produced by Inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) produced by the United Nations.
Economist on the other hand tend to raise the question of insurance principle, in other words, if the cost of the premium exceeds the cost of the risk, don’t insure.
Which means the Carbon Tax is going to cost more than letting global warming take place in the first place so we are best to do nothing in the foreseeable future.
One question we should be asking is how much will a 5% reduction in Australia’s emissions (which represents 1.2% of global emissions) actually achieve?
Well here are the numbers, and the truth may shock you!
- 0.06% of world carbon emission will be remitted over the next 10 years
- The amount of CO2 that would have been in the atmosphere according to the IPPC would fall from 412 to 411.987 parts per million. This would equate to 0.00007 degrees Celsius reduction in global warming.
This is a consensus, mainstream calculation. This is 1/14,000 of Celsius degrees which is a 700th of the threshold below which no modern method or instrument can detect any change in global temperature at all! In other words, we could not even measure the decrease with the instruments we currently have.
How much will it cost?
Around $127 Billion over the next 10 years and if you were to apply the Julia Gillard method all over the world the method as cost in effect as her proposal then it would take $60,000 per head of the world population (just in the next 10 years) or 60% of global GDP just to forestall the 0.23 Celsius of global warming that the IPCC predicts will occur over the next 10 years. Consequently, this would also mean that no one could drive cars, fly planes, boats etc. No industry or household could use coal powered electricity. We would all have to go back to pre-industrial life for 10 years, at $60,000 each just so we do not allow the increase 0.23 Celsius, never mind reducing what is already there!
It is clearly cheaper to do nothing about global warming and to adapt in a focused way to any consequences that are adverse that may occur from any warming that may occur than to spend any money what so ever now.
So if the data doesn’t stack up, and it will cost way too much, why would Julia Gillard force this farce onto the Australian People?
If you want to learn the answer to that question – just follow the money!
Trust me, I think stopping pollution is a great idea, but the carbon tax and global warming scam has nothing to do with reducing pollution.
It is all about money, power and control of the population.
The global warming movement says our planet is heading for disaster because factories and cars are heating up the atmosphere with Carbon dioxide. But the fact is, it is all a scam. An industry that feeds off our fears, tricking us to buy billions of dollars worth of green products and making us lose sleep worrying about our carbon footprints.
It is all a polluter’s Ponzi scheme. Politicians say they want to set limits on CO2 emissions, and at the same time they allow corporations that want to pollute more to buy and trade carbon credits from companies that pollute less. In other words, permission to pollute – if they pay!
Thousands of scientists believe that global warming is not a problem at all
Global warming has occurred and climate change occurs all the time however human production of CO2 is not the cause of the warming.
The sun is the cause of all global warming. The sun as the root cause of global warming problem has been all but ignored by the authorities and in particular the IPCC from the United Nations that are pushing the human cause of CO2 and global warming.
Another interesting fact these people ignore is that CO2 is plant food! Yes, plants love CO2. In fact, studies show that plants grown in a 35% more carbon dioxide environment thrive growing twice as fast and producing more fruits and seeds. On top of this, plants release oxygen (what humans need) back into the atmosphere at night! So if anything, we should allow a small increase in CO2 because ultimately plants and humans would thrive!
So if human made global warming is not the cause, why are the telling us it is? Control! They can now control every aspect of your life. From the amount of children you can have to the type of vehicle you can drive, to the type of food you can consume. In others words, get used to only eating meat on a special occasion. Quite simply, if you can control carbon you can control the planet.
The cap and trade market is already reported to be worth trillions of dollars. The USA has already spent over $70 billion on science funding over the last 10 years. The last thing anyone would want to do is to solve the problem.
One company that stands to make billions from a Carbon Tax is The Hara Corporation. It has staked its future on global warming. The Hara Corporation says it can help companies reduce their carbon footprint through the use of their software program they specifically created to combat global warming. It works out your carbon footprint and how you can reduce it to save on carbon taxes. By getting a tick from Hara’s software program companies can save millions of dollars in carbon tax. So who wouldn’t want to use Hara’s software? In fact, one Silicon Valley newspaper article claimed Hara will become the next Microsoft. Did I mention who the majority investor is? Al Gore!
Where it all began
The entire global warming scam can be traced to 1 man – Maurice Strong. “Sir” Maurice Strong is a Canadian born, senior official for the United Nations. Strong has been very vocal over the last 20 years about forming a one world government based at the UN. The UN one world government would supersede all other country governments who would be little more than local administrators.
If Al Gore is the front man for global warming, Maurice Strong is the wizard behind the curtain. Maurice Strong was the secretary general of the UN’s 1972 conference on the Human Environment, the one which launched the green movement. It was at this conference Strong first introduced the idea of taxing nations for pollution. He then became the UN’s first Director of the Environment Program and organised the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992 which set the stage for the Kyoto treaty controlling the emission of green house gases. But many say Maurice Strong is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He pretended to be green so he could get rich and take over the world.
You see, Maurice Strong just happens to be a billionaire – an oil billionaire. He is a director of the Chicago Climate Exchange which trades and sells Carbon Credits – the ones that give permission to pollute. He has also been linked to the United Nations “Oil for Food” scandal where he was stood down by the UN for his involvement. He had to run to avoid criminal charges and ended up in Beijing, China. As of 2005 he has been working for the Chinese government helping them trade their pollution for clean credits – remember – permission to pollute slips!
Strong was one of those who were instrumental in establishing the Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC has produce 4 major assessments of the climate, each of them more absurd than the last and they have now got things to such a fever pitch that they manage to get the Australian government to agree on a carbon tax.
Falsifying the Data
It is now on record that the IPCC was caught red handed falsifying their data. The Climate Gate scandal is only one example.
Another example includes Dr. Benjamin Santer, a climate scientist and right hand man of Maurice Strong. He has admitted to altering a crucial UN report (IPCC Second Assessment Climate Change 1995). He deleted at least 5 opinions by leading scientists that opposed the global warming theory. So in other words, after the world’s leading climate scientists sent in their data and conclusions about climate change that basically said there was no basis to it, Santer took it on himself to “edit” those findings to support his own agenda. He makes no apologies either claiming he had to do it for the “benefit of the planet”.
The Final Piece of the Puzzle
George Hunt was an official at the 4th World Wilderness Congress conference when he met Maurice Strong in 1987. The Congress is an international forum for discussing the environment. But Maurice Strong showed up to introduce a new player, the financier Edmond de Rothschild of the Rothschild banking dynasty with a proposal for something he called a World Conservation Bank.
For those that are not familiar with the Rothschild family, they have amassed a conservative estimate of just over $500 Trillion dollars in assets, effectively owning around ½ of the world. They have started and financed every major military conflict since the Napoleonic Wars. They have bankrupted nations, chose and assassinated presidents and political rivals. The Rothschilds brokered the 1947 deal to hand over the Palestinian land to Israel. In fact, the Rothschilds openly brag that they own 80% of Israel and that the Star of David flag is actually their own flag that they convinced Israel to use as its national flag!
Hunt says that the aim of Strong and Rothschild was to create an anxiety about global warming to such a fevered pitch that people would be willing to accept one World Bank that would be willing to accept the responsibility of cleaning up the environment.
Through of all this, Maurice Strong has been the Rothschilds right hand man in the environmentalist movement. Through Strong they were able to monetise environmentalism.
In fact, in the USA, green products sales went from $203 Billion in 2007 to $400 Billion in 2010.
Almost every aspect of your life is connected to energy use and carbon emissions. From your hot shower in the morning, blow drying your hair, driving to work, cooking dinner and reading a book in bed using a bed side lamp (and your digital alarm clock). Therefore with the introduction of a carbon tax, everything in your life is going to go up in price.
The hardest hit will be pensioners and low income earners. That is why Gillard is trying to soften the blow by giving these people a so-called tax break of less than $10 per week. This will quickly be absorbed by the rising cost of living. By 2016, most pensioners and fixed income / low income earners will be destitute and begging on the streets. I would also like to go on record as predicting Australia will be getting “Smart Meters” soon to “save you money on power bills”. I would urge you to research these so-called smart meters. They basically turn your house into a microwave oven.
This is going to be seen as the biggest tax ever imposed on humanity in the history of the world. In effect, it is a tax on breathing. So for every dollar you spend on day to day living, a proportion of your hard earned money is going to go directly into the coffers of the Rothschild banking family, and you have the Australian government to thank for it. Our politicians have sold us to the global ruling families. It doesn’t matter if you vote Gillard out because there are another 10 puppets there to take her place.
What can we do?
We need to send the government and the elites a very clear message that this is not acceptable. Therefore, I propose that at the next election everyone write “None of the above” on their ballet paper. This will be deemed as an “informal” vote and cannot be counted. If there are enough informal votes, they cannot deem the election to have occurred. Australia will then be governed by a caretaker government (bureaucrats) until the political parties can put forward a decent representative. Remember, governments can only make laws and declare war – that is it! Everything else is handled by the bureaucracy. So if we are governed by a bureaucracy for 6-12 months then it just means no new laws can be passed, and Australia cannot declare war on anyone. I think it is quite simple.
© Danny Searle 2011