ObamaCARE [obamaTAX] makes RFID chip implants mandatory March 23, 2013 | via SODAHEAD.COM
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
July 21, 2012 in Health
This content was reported as spam by our users, click here to view.
So, when are these collectivists gonna realize, we are serious about NOT taking the mark? Seriously gotta love the moxie of these “persons”.
On Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the following Tuesday.
Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip), reads,
and I quote: “Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment”
H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1.
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’)
to facilitate analysis of post-market safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on
a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:
A class II implantable device is an “implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as
“claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that
allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data
environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed
appropriate by the Secretary.”
Class III devises are items such as breast implants, pacemakers,
heart valves, etc. A Class II device that is implantable is, as you seen
from the FDA, an implantable radio frequency transponder, RFID chip.
From breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only
possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B which
is, “for linking such data with the information included in the
registry”? As we know from subsection A, the information in the
registry is the name of a device. In plain speak, we are in a clear way
being told that our electronic medical records are going to be linked to
a class II implantable device!
“The Secretary to protect the public health; shall establish
procedures to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant to
subparagraph (A, remember subparagraph A is the class 2 implantable device reference) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph (3, which is electronic medical records); and to permit analyses of linked data;”
Continuing on to page 1007, in the STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA,
AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA section, the secretary of health and human
services is given full power to intact all mandates from the laundry
list of to-do items in the creation process of the registry as well as
dictate how the devises listed in the National Medical Device Registry
are to be used and implemented.
“The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting through the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology,
shall adopt standards, implementation specifications, and certification
criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic
health records of a unique device identifier for each device described
in paragraph 1 (National Medical Device Registry), if such an identifier
is required by section 519(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device.”
Notice here in this part which is at the beginning of 2000 plus pages of the law, it is carefully worded “which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card”.
Here we are told that it may be a card. As you have already seen,
deeper in the law [Sec. 2521 Pg. 1000] what this “may” utilize is
clearly spelled out as a “class II device that is implantable”.
Now on Page 503, section E Lines 13-17 and I quote: “encourage, as
appropriate, the development and use of clinical registries and the
development of clinical effectiveness research data networks from
electronic health records, post marketing drug and medical device surveillance efforts”. Let me say that again, medical device surveillance efforts!
Now lets look at section 163 of HR3200, which gives the government a
direct electronic access to your bank account which will work in
conjunction with an implanted chip.
Page 58 Lines 5 through 15 reads:
(D) enable the real-time (or near real time) determination of an individual’s financial
responsibility at the point of service and, to the extent possible,
prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible for a
specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which
may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary
identity detection card; (E) enable, where feasible, near real-time
adjudication of claims
What does this mean? It means that the government will give everybody a
health ID card that contains a machine readable device (magnetic strip
or RFID chip) similar to a credit card. Embedded in this chip or strip
is your Health Identification Number. When you visit a medical provider,
the medical claims will be processed while you are still in the office.
The medical providers will be paid in real time. The portion that you
owe will be deducted from your bank account, in real time, according to