Avatar of Ronald

Second Amendment and Obama

0 rating, 0 votes0 rating, 0 votes (0 rating, 0 votes, rated)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ... Loading ...

December 28, 2012 in Guns


Second Amendment and Obama
Glad Armed Men Guard My Daughters:
Obama Brags
Copyright December 25th 2012
Ronald Boldt


With the recent Democrat attack against the Constitution it was aired on Barbra Walters show, that Obama and his wife actually bragged up the fact that he is proud that he has armed guards that protect his daughters in school.

Here is what he said to Barbra Walters:

BARBARA WALTERS, HOST: Now, Malia recently got her first cell phone. Do you monitor it and see who she calls or who she texts?

MICHELLE OBAMA: I give my daughter at this age, I give her a long rope, you know, and there is monitoring because we have rules. But monitoring may be “You never know when I’m going to walk in your room and I’m going to definitely ask you, ‘Who are you talking to and are you talking about school work?”’

BARACK OBAMA: And they’re not very good at lying. We joke sometimes about how, you know, Malia’s getting to the age now, and boys start calling, and, you know, sort of, I always talk about how one of the main incentives for running again was continuing secret service protection so there are men with guns around at all times when…

WALTERS: Mr. President, boys can call the White House and say, “May I speak to Malia,” and they get put through?

You notice that there was an editing and censoring done before the clip went out, with Barbra Walters quickly changing the subject so as the Moron In Chief wouldn’t hang himself with his own stupidity.

Walters noted at the beginning of the segment that its airing had been postponed as a result of the shootings, at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

When he stated the fact about having “guns around at all times” was one of the reasons for the delay in the broadcast of the show since he had stated before that he would not arm teachers or others in schools to protect the nations children.

What is clear, is that Obama has no problem with members of the Secret Service having guns to protect himself and his family. As a matter of fact the Obama children are protected by a total of eleven armed guards, that we the taxpayers have to pay for.

The Elite have no problems with their kids going to a school that is protected by armed security.
The question that we need to ask is this shouldn’t the rest of the nation be accorded the same right?
What I have noticed is the fact that pressitute media has not made one single mention of this nor do they point out this hypocrisy when Obama calls for tighter gun regulations and stripping away the Second Amendment Rights?
I demand and so should everyone else for the safety of the people in the White House and all of DC, that The White House should be a total gun free zone, no one from armed civilians to military to police or even Secret Service should be armed there.

The White House has snipers on the roof at all directions facing not within the property but outwards towards the enemy of the state, the American People, there is Stinger Missiles, Rocket Launchers, and land to air missiles throughout that area, and is also travels with the POTUS where ever he goes. So doesn’t that mean that when he went to talk at the school where the False Flag was done that he broke the law and needs to be arrested?

The liberals all say that we do not have the right to keep and bear arms and yet they will allow a dictator to have them.

The liberal media will say that gun owners are nuts, and yet they forget that it is the Second Amendment that protects their rights to run their mouths with the drivel that they spew like a horses ass that they are.

Here is the Bill of Rights
The Preamble to The Bill of Rights
Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.
ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.
Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the “Bill of Rights.”
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment III
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

I will explain the concept of the Second Amendment and what it means:
Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

A well regulated Militia, —-Well Regulated Militia means this, the people within the community shall be armed with military weapons so that they could protect their communities from all enemies foreign and domestic. This was done so that there could never be a long standing army or military might. This would free up tax dollars on having to pay for standing military, and the logical fact that if the people were armed with military grade weapons, then they could react instantly against any threat.

Along with this the fact that by having the people armed with the military grade weapons, they could prevent a government from overthrowing their rights.

In 1854 the US Supreme Court ruled that any private person does have the right to own military weapons, and that it is illegal for anyone including the police to prevent anyone from carrying any weapon. This has never been overturned.

being necessary to the security of a free State, —-Here it reiterates that the people, not the government or a select few individuals have to right to own operate carry and use both as defensive and offensive weapons to protect their persons, homes and way of life.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.—This final statement is important since the federal government in the 1967 Gun Act violates the Constitution by saying people who have been convicted cannot own firearms, nowhere is this allowed in the Constitution, as a matter of fact it shows very clearly that they cannot stop them from having owning or using them. For this to be done, any gun control law you have to do it through a Constitutional Amendment, which they have not done, and as such violates the Constitution and is a act of High Treason.

SO when you read it and understand what they meant and still means today is that WE THE PEOPLE, have to same rights as the military and police to have own operate any weapon that we can buy, without fear or threat of wrongful imprisonment and execution.

So now you know the whole truth.

Infowars.com Videos:

Comment on this article:

2 responses to Second Amendment and Obama

  1. Stop gun violence. Disarm the U.S. government!!

  2. This is a great article. Very articulate and lucid. I agree with your stance on this completely. That those in power want the right to keep and bear arms to stay in force for them is obvious. What is also obvious is that they are counting down to the day when the line between slave and master is defined with crystal clarity and we are helpless to oppose it. The frustrating thing is that even those with surprisingly sharp minds are under some kind of an anomalous brain fog when it comes to the government and the scene in The Matrix when Morpheus offers the red or blue pill gnaws undeniably into my consciousness. It’s happening and it really concerns me. I point out with daily regularity truths that I view as unimpeachable, given the evidence and I am touted as a foil-hat who believes in all manner of fairy tales. I suppose all we can do is to keep at it. I’ve been writing commentary for about four years now and I must say I have made quite a few converts and opened some eyes, and many of those people are doing the same. The awareness is, as a result of our efforts, expanding exponentially and that is certainly encouraging. We can but hope we make enough of a difference in time.
    Again, excellent article, my friend. Keep at it.

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.