Avatar of fflandro

Obama to bypass congress to ban semiautomatic firearms

0 rating, 0 votes0 rating, 0 votes (0 rating, 0 votes, rated)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ... Loading ...

November 29, 2012 in Guns




An anti-gun owner initiative considered in Washington could lead to massive civil disobedience and a severe domestic crisis, gun law expert John M. Snyder warned on Friday.

“According to confidential information,” he said, “forces linked with the administration suggest the government classify semiautomatic firearms and multiple capacity ammunition feeding devices as Title 2 National Firearms Act items under the Gun Control Act of 1968.

Americans familiar with federal gun laws understand that under this scenario, semiautomatics and high capacity magazines could be acquired only with great difficulty and at great expense by America’s estimated 100 million law-abiding firearms owners, notes Snyder.

According to Snyder and other gun ownership advocates, the Obama administration long ago realized it would have insurmountable difficulty getting a semiautomatic gun ban, such as that considered by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and others, passed Congress, especially when the House is controlled by defenders of the Second Amendment.

Congressional Second Amendment supporters already are preparing for such a battle. During the Clinton years, Congress enacted a partial, temporary semiautomatic ban but allowed it to sunset after 10 years because of its lack of significant negative impact on crime, according to surveys conducted by the National Association of Chiefs of Police.

The Obama administration, now safely reelected, may order the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to take the classification step. Some gun-grabbers view the designation of Street Sweeper shotguns as Title 2 firearms during the Clinton administration as precedent for such a move.

For several years, various groups and individuals have discussed the anti-gun owner proclivities of the current administration. Obama anti-gun owner activities have involved the promulgation of anti-gun federal regulations, the appointment of anti-gun judges to the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, and the appointment of anti-gun personnel to other high federal positions, including the appointment of an attorney general of the United States who is suspected by many observers of playing politics with the nation’s law enforcement community.

“It’s been under this attorney generalship that the infamous Fast and Furious federal gun running scandal involving ATF has occurred,” Snyder stated. “The administration may feel that a replacement in that office could facilitate a ratcheting-up of its anti-gun activities with announcement and inauguration of the proposed semiautomatic classification/ban.”

“Such a move surely would galvanize the law-abiding grass roots gun-owning American public into opposition as it never has before. At the very least, it would lead to an action in the U.S. House of Representatives to defund if not eliminate entirely the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. To what it would lead at the very most is anyone’s guess,” warns Snyder.

A former NRA editor and director of national gun rights organizations, Snyder has been defending the individual Second Amendment civil right of law-abiding American citizens to keep and bear arms for over 46 years. He’s been called the senior rights activist in Washington by Shotgun News. He also serves on the advisory board of the National Association of Chiefs of Police.

Infowars.com Videos:

Comment on this article:

3 responses to Obama to bypass congress to ban semiautomatic firearms

  1. here we go! Germany, Poland, czechoslovakia. all disarmed before the genocide started. we have to let the people in power know that law abiding citizens will not give up their 2ND amendment rights without a fight. why didn’t the Japanese invade the west coast? because as the the Japanese high command put it “there is a gun behind every blade of grass”. what other rights does he want to eradicate. this is not only a 2ND amendment issue.

  2. Yes, massive civil disobedience when we have had enough and stand up and just say F*#k NO! We have a law in this state that says people who own pistols have to pay $25 and take a 25 question test every five years. The questions on the test are double negatives example: It is never okay to not leave a loaded firearm in plain view of a child. Some BS like that! I bought my pistols years ago and I refuse to take a stupid test let alone pay the state to keep records on my! In this case, I said F’#k NO!

    • As you should. Those illegal laws are in direct conflict to the right to bear arms.

      As it is a RIGHT.

      It’s silly the authoritarian liberals make people ignorant through school and then prey on their ignorance.

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.