Wow, this article pretty much blows what he said out of proportion, and given that the link to the interview was right there I’m surprised. I don’t take him as advocating it in a serious sense at all. He flat out says that he doesn’t think they will “go away” so how can anyone take his suggestion to “give it to them so they will go away” was some sort of solid endorsement of the bill?
Max said on February 6, 2013
Wow, this article pretty much blows what he said out of proportion, and given that the link to the interview was right there I’m surprised. I don’t take him as advocating it in a serious sense at all. He flat out says that he doesn’t think they will “go away” so how can anyone take his suggestion to “give it to them so they will go away” was some sort of solid endorsement of the bill?